UPDATE 8/27/2008:
Since this post was originally made, ONA has made several changes to correct some of the critical issues brought up below. Please review my update here.
Online News Association
http://journalists.org/
Organization background and purpose:
A newer journalism organization founded and focused on online news.
Organization vibe:
Professional. Suit coat and slacks type events where there’s an open bar but you have to hold a napkin with your drink. Kinda like a serious professional networking event that you attended as a freshman in college where you were incredibly nervous because you just don’t want to trip over a table cloth and knock over the bar crushing a basket of conspicuously placed kittens (or screw up publicly in some other way).
Cost to join:
$50 for professional
(I’m not sure about student rates, the ONA membership registration site isn’t working at the moment so I can’t give you any other numbers)
Benefits / “What you getâ€:
Read their official schpeal
ONA lists a lot of stuff on their “why to join page” but I haven’t used much of it the four years I’ve been a member. Most of the stuff on this page is either sorely outdated (Is there a “members-only biweekly newsletter†that I’m not aware of?), of small/questionable benefit (“Legal resources†is a series of 7 articles summarizing chapters from the book “Web Publishing Lawâ€) or an extra charge (such as the conferences and competitions listed as a benefit). Basically, I look at this list (as a paying member) and wonder … where’s the beef?
I will say, ONA audio is a new section with promise. Right now it’s only four articles with audio, but hopefully it’ll be more after this year’s conference and events. It’s about time! I’ve slammed ONA before for being greedy by charging $149 for their conference audio, so I won’t go into that in depth here.
The conference experience:
ONA’s conference is a great place to network and find new jobs and meet people. There are lots of the big dogs at the top publications here and they’re just standing around with a Yahootini in a sport coat and sensible shoes. Also, if you ever want to work for (or shut down, for that matter) Tribune Media, go to ONA — there’s always dozens and dozens of Tribune leaders there (Seriously, does Tribune own part of ONA? How do they send that many people each year to the shindig?). As for the conference panels/discussion, I’m usually underwhelmed by the actual ONA conference and leave thinking, “Ok. I never need to go to another ONA conference again.†But somehow I end up going again and again, they keep reeling me in.
It’s not a bad time; I just wish it was more inspiring and cutting edge.
Other events, workshops:
In the past year ONA has really started rocking out and having a lot more regional meet ups, many of which are networking based or co-sponsored with other organizations. (I haven’t been able to attend any since they’re usually in LA or NY.) It’s a definite positive sign they’re reaching out to have more activities.
My favorite things about being a member:
+ Like I said, ONA is *the* place for targeted networking if you want a job in online and can ‘network’ with people. If that is the only way you can get a job though, please don’t ever talk to me.
+ The online news listserv has become very active over the past year and had some great discussions on current issues. Although I think the listserv should be renamed, “The Roblimolist,†after Robin “Romblimo†Miller, the most active member and an editor for SourceForge Inc.
+ ONA is getting more involved in at least raising awareness for online rights. I haven’t heard anything about them actually taking legal action or getting anything done like the NPPA, Society of Professional Journalists, Electronic Frontier Foundation or other organizations… but it’s a very positive step forward. As you know if you read this blog I’m always linking to updates about net neutrality and online rights that affect anyone that uses the internet (especially publishers). Too many people sit silent!
My least favorite things about being a member:
- ONA just feels a lot like what’s killed the media. Ivory towers. The same 10-20 people running things. Little diversity of ideas and people with lots of white, older, male folks. (I can say that as a somewhat older, somewhat white, somewhat male folk). Lots of cliques. Lots of sport coats, nervous looks and hand wringing. ‘Follow-me’ innovation. Lots of consultants and general bureaucratic douchebaggery. It’s about as ‘old media’ as you can get in a new media organization.
- Cyberjournalist.net – The official ONA news blog is Cyberjournalist. It’s a cool, established blog that is somewhat regularly updated with a few experimental features (wiki, jobs and such). That’s all cool! What’s not is that evidently in the future ‘cyber journalists’ don’t cite sources because Cyberjournalist practically never does. No link love, no “via …,” no acknowledgment at all where the information is coming from. I’m surprised the Online News Association would endorse a blog that doesn’t play nice.
(For the record, I know I’m not the best example for blogging practices but I do try my best to almost always directly link to the source that gave me the information. That link relationship recognition is the basis of what makes the web awesome. It’s what makes us *not* print media. It drives traffic, readership, revenue and popularity to the source and back; they deserve it for sharing that information. In fact, you’ll rarely ever even see a ‘via’ text link on Journerdism because I always go to the source, unless I can’t – I.e. someone emailed me a link. Then I’ll do the ‘via’ thing. Anyway, I’m just saying, step off the ivory tower and give credit where credit is due.)
The most exciting thing to look forward to from this organization:
Andrew DeVigal’s Interactive Narratives 2.0 relaunch is going to be freaking fantastic; ONA is involved in that somehow ( although it’s not really clear how right now). I’m really encouraged by it though and hope as the organization grows out of it’s awkward, anxious teenage years it can now start to rock out and take a lead in the online journalism profession helping establish standard practices, offer training opportunities, protect the craft from legal attacks and evil doers, as well as encourage excellence and innovation in storytelling and audience engagement.
Read more reviews of the four best online and multimedia journalism professional organizations.
January 15, 2008 at 12:19 am
Good info, as I was toying with the joining journalists.org; My one question is how good is their online job listing? Since my company looks shaky, would it be worth it to join for job info on top of the other “perks”?
January 15, 2008 at 12:50 am
Hey Michelle,
Thanks for reading and commenting!
Here’s a current screen grab from the exclusive, member’s only online job listings. Not too much in there… Journalism Jobs and the Poynter Job listings are probably your two best allies for finding posted gigs.
As for networking and getting on important people’s radar, ONA could potentially help with that if you attend the conference and really work it. But you could probably get the same results from doing some awesome work, winning awards or volunteering for a workshop, journalism organization or event.
There are many ways to ‘bait that hook’ and it’s hard to say which will ‘snag the right fish.’
Thanks again for commenting and please let me know if you have any other questions!
Good luck!
Will
January 16, 2008 at 3:08 am
You’re wicked awesome, thanks Will! It’s pretty much what I suspected, so I’ll definitely think about it. It probably wouldn’t hurt to join maybe 1 or 2 associations this year.
I heart Journerdism, keep up the good work!
January 22, 2008 at 11:30 am
Just wanted to clarify a few ONA particulars you’ve listed above…
The membership and board are both very diverse. There are indeed several women and groups that don’t quite fit into the old white guy category. (For more, see: http://journalist.org/about/archives/000011.php).
This year, the conference is being planned by two non-Ivories: Tiffany Shackelford and myself.
ONA is growing rapidly and we’re doing lots to both educate journalists about the future of online journalism and to spark innovation among everyone working digitally. I’d really encourage every journalist to join, to join the listserv and to attend this year’s conference in Washington D.C. Last year we had speakers from way outside of traditional journalism – folks who are developing software, aggregators, games and more. This year, I can guarantee you that the conference will include lots of hands-on training, opportunities to meet tech folks and many great networking opportunities…
January 23, 2008 at 1:24 am
Hey Amy,
Thanks for commenting. I’ll agree that the board is just about as diverse as it’s ever been, but the membership is still predominately Ivory Tower folks. AME’s, Executive Editors and consultants. Lots of suits. No code monkeys that I can chat shop with. And the organization as a whole (at least from those who attend the conferences and events) doesn’t compare in diversity to that of SND, the NPPA or even Sports Shooter — especially when it comes to age and rank within organizations.
ONA’s membership has definitely been growing rapidly but I’d equate that more to the Internet’s rapid growth and not evidence of how great the organization is run. Despite what you say, I still haven’t seen any concrete evidence that ONA has done much in the way of technical training for their members beyond the workshop before the conference (which costs extra anyways, and couldn’t therefore really be considered a ‘membership benefit’).
Especially compared to what the three other groups highlighted here bring to the table, ONA is slacking. To be honest, I almost didn’t include them in the list. It’s a good group but not a really great group. Where are the membership fees going? There’s not even a monthly/quarterly publication that can be used to justify the fees.
I appreciate all the work you and Tiffany are doing for the upcoming conference and I hope it’ll be the best ever. I’m looking forward to it and hope the organization redeems itself or I may not be renewing my membership.
Cheers,
Will